2007/01/05
IRC [00:39] *** jhavard parted the chat.
IRC [01:34] *** zxcv joined the chat.
IRC [01:40] *** zxcv parted the chat.
IRC [04:07] <frankie> Dossy: sorry i was away
IRC [04:07] <frankie> Dossy: the only con about cvs->svn migration is due to possible change in commitment style
IRC [04:08] <frankie> Dossy: basically svn has one single tree, but aolserver has many contributors
IRC [04:08] <frankie> Dossy: so it's not that easy tracking single modules changes _if_ people do not maintain an inner version number for each module
IRC [04:09] <frankie> Dossy: in cvs that's basically done file per file, in svn there's one single version per commit
IRC [04:10] <frankie> Dossy: but for that svn is MUCH more nice to use in respect with cvs
IRC [04:11] <frankie> basically distro maintainers need atomic commits and tracking of single module, that's all. If people work smarty definitively that's not a problem
IRC [09:16] <Dossy> What would be an example of "good" vs "bad" ?
IRC [09:16] <Dossy> If people just commit "all" their working changes in a single SVN commit, that's bad.
IRC [09:16] <Dossy> But, if each commit is a logical single "change" then it's good, right?
IRC [09:59] *** jeremy_c joined the chat.
IRC [09:59] <jeremy_c> Dossy: any thoughts on when adp_parse will work with the new singlescript setting?
IRC [10:17] <Dossy> Oh, it does ...
IRC [10:17] <Dossy> It's not a singlescript issue.
IRC [10:17] <Dossy> It's a "you can't use ns_adp_* outside of a connection context" issue.
IRC [10:17] <Dossy> Are you doing ns_adp_parse in a scheduled proc or something?
IRC [10:22] <frankie> Dossy: yes that's the idea
IRC [10:56] <jeremy_c> I have set pagedata [ns_adp_parse -file "file.adp"]
IRC [10:56] <jeremy_c> then I want to put that into a cache item.
IRC [10:57] <jeremy_c> In file.adp, I have: <% for .... { %> html stuff <% } %> ... that does not work via ns_adp_parse but does when I access file.adp via web browser.
IRC [14:14] <Dossy> Right.
IRC [14:15] <Dossy> jeremy_c: Right. So, what you'll likely have to do is either modify your code to not use the singlescript behavior, OR, modify your code to make a HTTP request back to itself to fetch the ADP that way.
IRC [14:15] <Dossy> Perhaps it'll be possible in the future to do things the way you're trying, but right now, I don't think it's possible.
IRC [14:39] <jeremy_c> Dossy: so requesting the info via a http call is the normal way to get an adp page into the cache?
IRC [14:48] *** jeremy_c parted the chat.
IRC [14:49] *** jeremy_c joined the chat.
IRC [14:50] *** jeremy_c parted the chat.
IRC [14:54] *** jeremy_c joined the chat.
IRC [15:24] *** partymola parted the chat.