2004/11/18
IRC [00:15] *** rubick parted the chat.
IRC [00:30] *** brunom parted the chat.
IRC [00:32] <Dossy> ...
IRC [01:44] *** zoro2 joined the chat.
IRC [02:48] *** zoro2 parted the chat.
IRC [03:17] *** tekbasse joined the chat.
IRC [04:23] *** frankie joined the chat.
IRC [05:13] *** zoro2 joined the chat.
IRC [05:49] *** Whisper joined the chat.
IRC [07:32] *** Whisper parted the chat.
IRC [07:40] <AndyPiskorski> Random question: Is there a way to exec a subprocess such that it severs all ties to its parent process? On MS Windows?
IRC [07:41] <AndyPiskorski> Because what I see is that the parent process hangs around in some fashion until the child exits, which is causing me trouble.
IRC [09:46] *** frankie parted the chat.
IRC [11:55] *** zoro2 parted the chat.
IRC [12:06] *** rubick joined the chat.
IRC [12:42] *** martinh parted the chat.
IRC [12:59] *** zione joined the chat.
IRC [13:18] *** zoro2 joined the chat.
IRC [13:32] <zione> hi! can i run nsvhr and serve pages from the same instance ?
IRC [13:37] *** bartt joined the chat.
IRC [13:40] <zione> it seems it cannot be done
IRC [13:42] <zione> do i have to add ns_param EnableTclPages Off
IRC [13:42] <zione> even in aolserver 4.0x ?
IRC [13:45] <Dossy> ?
IRC [13:45] <Dossy> no, not with nsvhr
IRC [13:45] <Dossy> nsvhr turns the nsd into a 100% proxy -- IIRC
IRC [13:54] *** zoro2 parted the chat.
IRC [14:27] <zione> then, the configuration file can be almost empty, and the memory usage quite low, or shall i increase threads and so forth ?
IRC [14:31] <zione> also, i think, i should to without ns_log module... and what about ns_cache ns_sha ? any suggestion ? are those needed by proxy ?
IRC [15:11] *** martinh joined the chat.
IRC [15:24] *** tekbasse parted the chat.
IRC [15:45] <Dossy> yes, you can avoid loading most everything
IRC [15:45] <Dossy> i might load ns_log just to see any traffic that's not making it past the proxy, etc.
IRC [16:15] <zione> ok, that seems sensible, i managed to reduce memsize to 2mb, at least, on startup seemingly, sounds good !
IRC [16:21] <zione> now, i'll go through wondering what the differences between unix and socks redirections would be... but i think there aint' no big difference in performance, is it ?
IRC [17:52] *** bartt parted the chat.
IRC [18:11] <zione> seems nsvhr places port number after domain ? if no port is provided, if i provide a port it masks it, if i dont... weird
IRC [18:15] <zione> at least, this seems an nssock limitation, am i correct ?
IRC [18:19] <zione> maybe it all depends on having the "slave" server configured for both internal and external addresses...
IRC [18:23] *** brunom joined the chat.
IRC [19:07] *** brunom parted the chat.
IRC [19:08] <zione> i came to think the only way not to have the port in the url is to use nsunix. now i'm not able to compile it :( make gives errors on cvs checkout, while make for nsvhr would go smoothly
IRC [19:11] *** bartt joined the chat.
IRC [19:16] <zione> is nsunix for 3.x versions only ?
IRC [20:21] <zione> anyone awake ?
IRC [20:22] <bartt> Last time I checked it was.
IRC [20:23] <zione> so you are here and there *
IRC [20:23] <zione> i wanted to share my discovery about nsvhr
IRC [20:23] <zione> but you know already
IRC [20:23] <bartt> :)
IRC [20:26] <zione> i'll post a message on aolserver mailing and leave here for those with an open session which sometime may wake up
IRC [20:26] <zione> it is indeed as i was thinking: if the redirect is from port xyz to port hij that (i mean nsvh+nssock) would work, instead port 80 to port hij would show port hij
IRC [20:41] *** rubick parted the chat.
IRC [20:44] <zione> no, it seems it's openacs bug... we'll see
IRC [20:45] <zione> bye
IRC [20:45] *** zione parted the chat.
IRC [21:02] *** bartt parted the chat.
IRC [22:08] *** zoro2 joined the chat.
IRC [22:09] *** zoro2 parted the chat.