Difference between revisions of "AOLserver Bugs and Problems"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* Can you provide a short snippet of sample code (incl. sample data, and what you get as output) from ns_sha1 as well as one other library implementation, so we might be able to identify where the difference is coming from? ''-- [[User:Dossy|Dossy]] 07:10, 3 December 2005 (EST)'' | * Can you provide a short snippet of sample code (incl. sample data, and what you get as output) from ns_sha1 as well as one other library implementation, so we might be able to identify where the difference is coming from? ''-- [[User:Dossy|Dossy]] 07:10, 3 December 2005 (EST)'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ** Such information is on the linked [[ns_sha1]] page. --[[User:Caveman|Caveman]] 09:27, 3 December 2005 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:27, 3 December 2005
Bugs should be reported using the SourceForge Bug Tracker for the AOLserver project.
Has anyone succesfully run 4.0.7 (or any other version) on SuSE 8 for AMD64? It appears to build OK (built against 64 bit build of Tcl 8.4.5) but when run throws a
NsTclInitObjs: sizeof(int) < sizeof(long) Aborted
error
Thanks
Damien
Dossy 27jul2004 - Damien, Tomasz Kosiak asked the same question on the AOLserver mailing list and Jim Davidson responded that commenting out the failing check you experienced may be safe. Tomasz then replied that he'd followed Jim's advice, and it seems to be working just fine. Once I get some time on a AMD64 system, I'll do some testing and commit the change. For now, you can either make the same change Tomasz did, or wait.
---
I am having problems with ns_sha1 returning sha1 hashes that differ from all other library implementations. -Caveman
- Can you provide a short snippet of sample code (incl. sample data, and what you get as output) from ns_sha1 as well as one other library implementation, so we might be able to identify where the difference is coming from? -- Dossy 07:10, 3 December 2005 (EST)
